21/06/2025
Poll results showed 39% willing to restore UL1. To be fair it's a risky decision, however I was among the 39%, and my clinical decision was influenced by some factors including:
1. Bone condition and support
2. Patient occlusion (specially eccentric jaw movements)
3. Patient needs and motivation, after discussion of all available treatment options including Implant, cantilever bridge, Maryland Bridge, conventional bridge and removable denture.
I am sure many clinicians have got the skills that allow them to restore such tooth, but such cases are not about the clinical technicality, it is all about the scientific evidence on which a transparent discussion with the patient should be held in regards to the treatment longevity, post treatment tooth functionality and aesthetics. Occlusion was favourable enough and did not show any discripency that may put excessive unrequired lateral forces on the tooth. Bone support shows good quality and quantity. Patient refused all other treatments and really believed that she should give it a second chance as she/he already went through extensive treatment by having apicectomy 20 years ago. Acccordingly, a second chance was the treatment choice specially that ferrule was found available buccal and palatally only (2mm)
Treatment was done in one session including the CEREC crown make and fit (CAD/CAM). Long term review is crucial.