07/26/2020
We've been made aware that we're losing a lot of patients who were referred but are too young for treatment. They've decided to go elsewhere.
"Early treatment" is the thought that taking care of things at an early age prevents bigger problems later on. This simply is not true. It's a favourite amongst dentists who like to do braces because it's more of a business decision that anything else.
For example, for overbite, there are some excellent studies that every orthodontist knows about, which are 25 years old already, which show that there is no difference in results in a 2-phase treatment (early, then tidy up in teens) is done early compared to results when treatment is in the teens (1-phase). The difference is cost. "Better get on it now" doesn't apply here.
I know braces are expensive. With things the way they are in Midland, I feel a responsibility to make sure that people are not wasting their funds on a 2-phase treatment, or on wasted consult fees. I've made treatment decisions based on what a patient needs, not what I need. Dentists just don't get orthodontics and, as a result, don't really know the best time to make a referral. I can't seem to get the message across. So if a "get on it now" idea is planted, then we say "too young," the damage has already been done.
We do look at all the referral forms and don't just look at the age and slam the door. It ends up being hard not to think that we're brushing off a patients or parents concern.
The biggest problem here, with an early treatment, is the "extra" time in braces, with the abscence of fluoride, greatly increases the risk of cavities. Actually, it's not a risk, it's a certainty. Plus, people definitely burn out on their retainers, so things fall apart 100% of the time before a second phase of treatment.
It's tough, but I'll always make conscientious treatment decisions even if it is working against us and dentists don't bother to call us about it.