09/05/2014
URGENTE - Participación GRATUITA asociaciones en DEMANDA JUDICIAL sobre efectos de CEM (Campos Electromagnéticos) en la salud. Juicio en Nueva York sobre ElectroHiperSensibilidad. www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=400 Responder antes del 13.5.14. [A MERCURIADOS nos llegó esta info de madrugada..]. Deben ser asociaciones que tengan socios con ElectroHiperSensibilidad, pero no tienen que ser únicamente asociaciones que exclusivamente se centran en Campos Electromagnéticos-ElectroHiperSensilidad. De hecho MERCURIADOS participará en esta Demanda, pues la intoxicación por mercurio da lugar o agrava (según cada caso) la ElectroHiperSensilidad.
La organización que quiera participar, tiene que enviar un email a Dafna Tachover , con esta información:
- Nombre completo de la organización firmante y del representante que diga que dicha organización acepta participar en la demanda "Arthur Firstenberg's ADA lawsuit - www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=400" como Amicus Brief, o lo que es lo mismo Amicus Curiae o Amicus Curiae Brief (ver ejemplo: http://wp.cedha.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Exposici%C3%B3n-de-motivos-para-la-legislaci%C3%B3n-de-la-figura-del-Amicus-Curiae-en-la-Jurisdicci%C3%B3n-Federal-Nacional-en-la-Republica-Argentina..pdf).
- Unas 5 líneas [en inglés] describiendo el propósito de la organización y por qué la ElectroHiperSensibilidad es relevante en la organización-asociación firmante. [Para quienes no puedan traducirlo al inglés, se ofrece Fina Carpena a hacerlo: [email protected] Tb. podemos traducir nosotros esas líneas: [email protected]].
NOTA: Se recuerda que participar en esta demanda NO implica ningún coste económico en el presente ni en el futuro.
-------- Mensaje original --------
De: "J. Ensalut"
Fecha:07/05/2014 09:34 (GMT+01:00)
Para:
Asunto: PETICION URGENTE! AGRADECERÍA ATENCIÓN IMMEDIATA -- EHS lawsuit in NM Court of Appeals needs organizations to give brief written support by May 10.
Os enviamos este importante correo que una compañera de ENSALUT nos remite desde EEUU para que colaboréis en un proceso judicial. Es muy sencillo, como ella misma nos explica. Rogamos le deis la máxima difusión.
Salud y lucha,
Eduard
Som l'Associació catalana ENSALUT, constituïda al juny del 2012. Treballem en la prevenció primària vers les condicions ambientals que ens afecten la salut. També hi formen part persones afectades per EHS i un dels temes que més ens preocupen son les repercussions dels CEM sobre la salut. Actualment, estem portant una proposta al Parlament de Catalunya per rebaixar els límits legals d'exposició als CEM i estem treballant en una campanya informativa sobre la repercusió de la implantació els SMART MERTERS amb tecnologia PLC amb l'objectiu d'exigir una tecnologia innòcua per la salut. Formem part de la PECCEM (Plataforma Estatal Contra la Contaminació Electromagnètica).
http://espainetsalut.wordpress.com/
[email protected]
La Junta Directiva de l'Associació ENSALUT
2014-05-07 1:01 GMT+02:00 Fina Carpena-Mendez :
Necesito su ayuda como representantes de asociaciones de personas que padecen EHS para el tribunal de apelaciones, de un juicio sobre EHS que sentará precedentes si se gana. Necesitamos una descripción de 5 líneas sobre su organización para el abogado que esta llevando el caso. Se necesita antes del día 10 de Mayo. Les ruego su apoyo. Si me la envían a mí en español yo la puedo traducir y reenviarla al abogado. Gracias!!!
Aquí tienen un ejemplo de una organización canadiense y su descripción como modelo:
http://www.weepinitiative.org/
The Canadian Initiative to stop wireless, electric and electromagnetic pollution was formed in 2005 by three Canadians living with EHS, all three of them diagnosed as such by the Univeristy of Toronto Women's College Hospital's Environmental Health Clinic. The organization has a history of fundraising for the presentation of speakers, of writing letters of advocacy, of frontline support for people living with EHS, and of disseminating digests of up to date science and news stories about electromagnetics and living systems.
Fina
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: B. Binder
Date: Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM
Subject: EHS lawsuit in NM Court of Appeals needs organizations to give brief written support by May 10
To: Fina Carpena-Mendez
All that is requested is:
Consent to add the name of your organization to the amicus brief.
5-line summary as to the purpose of your organization and why the issue of EHS is relevant to the activity of the organization.
This will NOT involve any costs to your organization present or future.
Please send the consent and 5-line summary via email to:
Dafna Tachover, Esq
(NY, Israel) MBA
EHS Fight Back
[email protected]
(518) 734 5628
Many thanks!
BACKGROUND
ABOUT THE LAWYER MAKING THE REQUEST
This request is being made by Dafna Tachover, Esq, the Israeli lawyer who has been successfully convincing the Israeli Supreme Court of the existence of EHS, the harmful effects of EMF, and that WiFi must be removed from schools to protect children's health.
On April 23, 2014, the Israeli Supreme Court issued a Conditional Injunction against WiFi in schools, meaning that the Supreme Court is convinced that there is a problem and decided that unless the Israeli Government can convince the Court by July 15, 2014 that WIRED internet cannot be used, a permanent order to ban WiFi will be issued.
REQUEST IS IN REGARD TO THIS LANDMARK EHS CASE
The request is in regard to Arthur Firstenberg's ADA lawsuit, started in 2010. (http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=400)
Briefly, the case seeks to affirm that the ADA and the US Constitution supercede the 1996 TCA, and that people with EHS should have protections against wireless technology.
On May 28, 2014, the New Mexico Court of Appeals will consider arguments that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the U.S. Constitution require cities to protect the rights of people injured by wireless technology.
RAMIFICATIONS
This case will set precedent not only for those with EHS but also for those whose health is impacted in other ways, short- and long-term, by wireless technology.
REQUEST IN DETAIL FROM DAFNA TACHOVER, ESQ
I’m writing to ask that your organization be part of 2 briefs I intend to submit in 2 legal actions which are now being heard in a US courts on the issue of electro-sensitivity (EHS). We need a response by May 10th. This will NOT involve any costs to your organization present or future.
It is very important as if these cases lose in the appeal, they will have global adverse effects on the issue of EHS. So we all must help to ensure that Arthur Firstenberg, who submitted the lawsuits will not lose.
This is very important.
Explanation:
Currently there are 2 cases in the US which were submitted by Arthur Firstenberg on the issue of EHS. Arthur has been working for decades to help people with EHS in the US and worldwide. Since there is no EHS organization as such in the US, Arthur is the closest in the US to such an organization. Many EHS people owe him their lives.
Although I am not a party to the cases, I intend to join the proceedings as what’s known as an ‘Amicus curiae’ which means “A friend of the Court’. It is a type of procedure in which someone who is not a party to the case submits a brief to the court which includes information that has a bearing on the case, with the intention of assisting the Court to reach the correct decision.
Usually an Amicus Brief is not submitted by a private person but by organizations that may be impacted by the Court’s decision.
I intend to submit the briefs to make sure the Court understands that EHS is a real, proven, global and urgent problem with a magnitude of an epidemic and that a decision that denies the existence of EHS and the disability rights of people with EHS will have devastating worldwide impact. Clearly, the recent decision of the Israeli Supreme Court will be helpful to us.
For the brief to have an impact on the court, we need it to be submitted on behalf of many national and international organizations.
Any organization which works to warn the public of the harmful effects of wireless technology qualifies.
I ask that your organization join my brief.
What is required to join the brief? Joining the brief only requires: (1) that you give your consent to add the name of your organization to the brief and (2) that you’ll write me a 5-line summary as to the purpose of your organization and why the issue of EHS is relevant to the activity of the organization. I’ll need the summary for the first brief by May 10.
When will the Brief be submitted? The Amicus brief in the first of the 2 cases must be submitted by May 28th, but I need to submit to the Court the list of organizations before May 14, so please respond ASAP.
Please be aware, that this month I have to leave my house and I don’t have a place to move to yet, and therefore I’ll be extremely short of time, so please help as much as you can by giving your consent as fast as possible and also by asking any other organization you know, to join the brief.
A failure of Arthur’s legal actions would mean denial of the existence of EHS, and the rights of people with EHS, and would have a devastating impact. We must all do we can to make sure that doesn’t happen.
The following is a summary of the 2 actions filed by Arthur and for which an amicus brief will be submitted:
An action against his neighbor for nuisance – claiming that her use of wireless gadgets injured him and forced him to leave his house. The lower court ruled that EHS is not a real condition but a psychological problem. The amicus brief will be submitted in support of the appeal of that decision.
An action against the City of Santa Fe and AT&T, on the issue of whether the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) and the Constitution are preempted by the Telecommunications Act which states that health concerns should be ignored in a decision to erect an antenna, among other issues.
Please join my brief, we all must do all we can not to lose these cases.
If you have any questions, email me or call me at (518) 734 5628.
Thank you,
Dafna
Dafna Tachover Esq
(NY, Israel) MBA
EHS Fight Back
[email protected]
Phone: +1 (518) 734 5628
Sent from my WIRED internet connection
The New Mexico Court of Appeals will shortly consider arguments that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the U.S. Constitution require cities to protect the rights of people injured by wireless technology.
